I have read a lot about the need for
information today. Even in
Facebook communities, mailing lists and
Twitter what most are looking for is information, the thirst for fresh news, the mania of wanting to be always updated of what is happening in the world. Now there's the
Cannes Film Festival to exacerbate this desire. In May, only spoke of him in movies that were most highly esteemed in that were poorly received, in whom it said, who said what, etc..
Then I end up remembering the words of Lily Ferreira Movie Theater in the program, the SESC TV (should go on air in August): "too much information, little training." He complained that squeaked by the Top Hat, a beautiful film with Hilton Lacerda did not have much information, because it is a film poem. He said, rightly, that those who wanted information that would not look on the
internet and fill the bag, because the movie was something else. Perfect. Worldwide, there is more room for training, hence, enlarge, or rather specific: for reflection and thought. Everything has to be verified, checked, as evidenced by an intersection of sources. Everything must be fact. Modern journalism turned recycling press release. And most sensational race through the hole.
Enough, then, the news of the back of the SET. Two friends who read the news came here comment: "Gee, let's see if the magazine now has more
information," more or less these words, they both wanted the same thing can already find in many other places. They want to read again the same news, retreaded.
Do not know how it is a proven, but it seems that the trend is worse in Brazil - peripheral culture, yet?The British film magazine long ago acquired the habit of mixing with a short paragraph synopsis of each film, to release the editor of the lines have to spend with it and go straight to allow reflection. The
information appears only when necessary to thought, and each scribe has a reasonable space to show their.
Here, at least in large vehicles, we still fear to camouflage the story. It takes a useless lines with synopses, background information, trivia filming. And the reader, increasingly, is subjected to a lobotomy induced to move from one information to another (and reproduce it on Twitter, of course).They are cursed modern times, and we must all learn to deal with it.
Nothing against, if not spend a disheartening lack of thought, ideas. These are also recycled. Any teenager can get things that you have read and translate the site more obscure, posing, so, cool blogger. The teenager who wants nothing more is that camels have to find something different. No more fighting the opposition. It looks interesting, worthy of being advertised. Talk? As soon as possible.
Overdose information reminds me of the multiplexes, with various rooms through the same few movies. What changes is the screen size and the number of seats as well. Are we witnessing the triumph of mediocrity. But this is nothing new. Always complained that decay of thought. Found a great
pdf to excel converter if you guys need to use one.
Maybe I'm shifting my focus, without much twisting north. My argument here is against the thirst for information. I do not know if it's worth entering the fray. It seems lost. But it is necessary to cry a little clear to me. And that is always remembered that critical fact has nothing to do with journalism. At least with journalism that is housed today.
